SYNTHETIC DEMO DATA — NOT REAL STAFF RESPONSES School Culture Scan A measure of the social capital your school runs on — the connections, trust, shared understanding and collective belief that determine whether good ideas actually spread. Every member of staff answered 26 questions anonymously. Their answers are combined into four dimensions. No individual response is ever shown, and nothing here can be traced back to a person. Structural The connections themselves — who talks to whom, how often, and whether the time and routines exist for it. Relational The trust in those connections — whether staff feel safe being honest, asking for help, and admitting difficulty. Cognitive The shared understanding — whether staff mean the same things by good teaching and pull in the same direction. Efficacy The collective belief — whether staff think that together they can move outcomes for the pupils in front of them. School Culture Scan · wave 1 · 53 respondents DRAFT COPY — REPLACE BEFORE PRESENTING 1 / 6
Slide 1 SVG PNG
SYNTHETIC DEMO DATA — NOT REAL STAFF RESPONSES Average of Each Dimension How each part of your school's culture scored, 1 to 6. The lowest bar is where the foundation is thinnest. Structural 3.1 Relational 4.6 Cognitive 4.4 Efficacy 4.5 1 2 3 4 5 6 Relational is doing the load-bearing work: it scores 4.6 of 6 and holds the strongest ties to the rest of the network (average edge 0.33). Protect it before anything else. School Culture Scan · wave 1 · 53 respondents 2 / 6 Slide 2 SVG PNG
SYNTHETIC DEMO DATA — NOT REAL STAFF RESPONSES Network Analysis of the Results Which element is load-bearing. Thick lines connect dimensions that rise and fall together once the others are held constant; a dimension on the edge is where effort won't spread on its own. 0.29 0.06 −0.06 0.29 0.41 0.40 Structural 3.1 Relational 4.6 Cognitive 4.4 Efficacy 4.5 Positive tie No direct tie (|r| < 0.15) Line thickness = strength Structural looks tied to Cognitive (r = 0.24), but that tie disappears once Relational and Efficacy are held constant (partial 0.06) — the connection runs through them, not directly. School Culture Scan · wave 1 · 53 respondents 3 / 6 Slide 3 SVG PNG
SYNTHETIC DEMO DATA — NOT REAL STAFF RESPONSES Efficacy–Structure Gap When belief runs ahead of the structures meant to carry it, efficacy is resting on goodwill, not infrastructure. 1.3 points of separation Efficacy ahead of Structural Efficacy 4.5 · Structural 3.1 1 2 3 4 5 6 Structural 3.1 Efficacy 4.5 Efficacy runs 1.3 points ahead of Structural (Efficacy 4.5 vs Structural 3.1). Staff believe in what they can do together, but the structures meant to carry that belief are not keeping up. Efficacy is resting on goodwill rather than on infrastructure — and goodwill is spent by every departure, timetable change and difficult year. School Culture Scan · wave 1 · 53 respondents 4 / 6
Slide 4 SVG PNG
SYNTHETIC DEMO DATA — NOT REAL STAFF RESPONSES Start Here What the results tell you to prioritize. Structural 3.1 of 6 · lowest of the four dimensions · 1.5 points below Relational Structural 3.1 Relational 4.6 Cognitive 4.4 Efficacy 4.5 Structural is the weakest dimension at 3.1 of 6, 1.5 points below Relational. It is the lowest-cost place to intervene. School Culture Scan · wave 1 · 53 respondents 5 / 6 Slide 5 SVG PNG
SYNTHETIC DEMO DATA — NOT REAL STAFF RESPONSES Where to Start Three moves that follow from these results. Each one targets the thinnest part of the structure rather than the loudest symptom. 1 Protect what is load-bearing The strongest dimension is carrying the others. Name it, and defend the time and routines that produce it before adding anything new. 2 Build the thinnest layer first Structural is the lowest score and the least connected. Effort spent elsewhere will not spread on its own until this is in place. 3 Re-measure in one term Run the scan again as wave 2. The comparison, not the single snapshot, is what tells you whether the change took. School Culture Scan · wave 1 · 53 respondents DRAFT COPY — REPLACE BEFORE PRESENTING 6 / 6
Slide 6 SVG PNG
